[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a9327758-dbd7-9272-b580-c9807bad2e24@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:15:23 +0100
From: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: peterhuewe@....de, stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: fix reference counting for struct tpm_chip
Hi
On 16.02.21 at 17:04, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>> + /*
>>> + * get extra reference on main device to hold on behalf of devs.
>>> + * This holds the chip structure while cdevs is in use. The
>>> + * corresponding put is in the tpm_devs_release.
>>> + */
>>> + get_device(&chip->dev);
>>> + chip->devs.release = tpm_devs_release;
>>> + chip->devs.devt =
>>> + MKDEV(MAJOR(tpm_devt), chip->dev_num + TPM_NUM_DEVICES);
>
> Isn't this less than 100 chars?
>
I just chose the same formatting that the original code used. Personally I prefer what
David suggested, so if there is no objection against it I will format it this way.
Regards,
Lino
Powered by blists - more mailing lists