[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ZCWLPQ.PR2X1S4YNGGC1@crapouillou.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 15:58:11 +0000
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: od@...c.me, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Fix doc of clk_get_parent
Le dim. 7 mars 2021 à 14:30, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
<linux@...linux.org.uk> a écrit :
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 02:29:07PM +0000, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Le dim. 7 mars 2021 à 14:27, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
>> <linux@...linux.org.uk> a écrit :
>> > On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 02:06:26PM +0000, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>> > > On error, or when the passed parameter is NULL, the return
>> value is
>> > > NULL
>> > > and not a PTR_ERR()-encoded value.
>> >
>> > No, the documentation is accurate. The CCF is just an
>> implementation
>> > of the API, the file you are modifying is the definitive API
>> > documentation.
>>
>> Well, then the code has to be fixed, because right now it returns
>> NULL on
>> error, since the 2.6 days.
>
> And you consider NULL to be an error? A NULL clock isn't defined to be
> an error by the API.
Fair enough. Ignore my patch then.
Cheers,
-Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists