linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kunit: make KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() quote values, don't print literals

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9f5df593-6584-b7d4-3b6e-ad77ee6f8760@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 2 Apr 2021 11:47:38 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: make KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() quote values, don't
 print literals

On 4/2/21 3:35 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:18 PM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Before:
>>>   Expected str == "world", but
>>>       str == hello
>>>       "world" == world
>>
>> After:
>>>   Expected str == "world", but
>>>       str == "hello"
>> <we don't need to tell the user that "world" == "world">
>>
>> Note: like the literal ellision for integers, this doesn't handle the
>> case of
>>    KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "hello", "world")
>> since we don't expect it to realistically happen in checked in tests.
>> (If you really wanted a test to fail, KUNIT_FAIL("msg") exists)
>>
>> In that case, you'd get:
>>>   Expected "hello" == "world", but
>> <output for next failure>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
> 

Hi Daniel,

Please run checkpatch on your patches in the future. I am seeing
a few checkpatch readability type improvements that can be made.

Please make changes and send v2 with Brendan's Reviewed-by.

thanks,
-- Shuah