[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210518234309.29014-3-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 01:43:08 +0200
From: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>
Cc: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] drivers: thermal: tsens: fix wrong check for tzd in irq handlers
Some device can have some thermal sensor disabled from the factory. The
current 2 irq handler functions check all the sensor by default and the
check if the sensor was actually registered is wrong. The tzd is
actually never set if the registration fail hence the IS_ERR check is
wrong.
Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
---
drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
index 4c7ebd1d3f9c..b1162e566a70 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tsens_critical_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
const struct tsens_sensor *s = &priv->sensor[i];
u32 hw_id = s->hw_id;
- if (IS_ERR(s->tzd))
+ if (!s->tzd)
continue;
if (!tsens_threshold_violated(priv, hw_id, &d))
continue;
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tsens_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
const struct tsens_sensor *s = &priv->sensor[i];
u32 hw_id = s->hw_id;
- if (IS_ERR(s->tzd))
+ if (!s->tzd)
continue;
if (!tsens_threshold_violated(priv, hw_id, &d))
continue;
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists