[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210603134536.GT30436@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 14:45:36 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, arm@...nel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: xen: Register with kernel restart handler
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 06:11:24AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:43:36PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 15:52, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > >
> > > Register with kernel restart handler instead of setting arm_pm_restart
> > > directly.
> > >
> > > Select a high priority of 192 to ensure that default restart handlers
> > > are replaced if Xen is running.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> >
> > This patch does appear to be useful.
> >
> > Is this just being solved in downstream trees at the moment?
> >
> > It would be nice if we could relinquish people of this burden and get it
> > into Mainline finally.
> >
>
> There must have been half a dozen attempts to send this patch series
> upstream. I have tried, and others have tried. Each attempt failed with
> someone else objecting for non-technical reasons (such as "we need more
> reviews") or no reaction at all, and maintainers just don't pick it up.
>
> So, yes, this patch series can only be found in downstream trees,
> and it seems pointless to submit it yet again.
It has plenty of reviews and acks, so that's not the problem. If you
look back at the 2019 attempt:
1) there was a pull request sent on the 2 October 2019 to the arm soc
guys to merge a series that quite obviously is outside of their
remit as it touches mostly ARM core code - it should have been
sent to me but wasn't, not even as a Cc.
2) I raised that issue, and as I could find no trace of the patches,
I asked for the to be posted - which they were, eventually, two
weeks later. It looks like I completely missed the patches amongst
all the other email I don't bother to read anymore though. In any
case, the pull request by that time would have been completely
forgotten about.
And that's where it ended - no apparent follow-ups until now.
*Shrug*.
So in summary, I was expected to notice the patches amongst all the
other email, and then remember that there was a pull request that
wasn't even addressed to me...
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists