[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMA4JBN8m1Unj6ph@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 09:10:20 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: rashmi.a@...el.com, Kishon <kishon@...com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [“PATCH” 2/2] phy: intel: Fix for warnings due to EMMC clock 175Mhz change in FIP
On 08-06-21, 14:52, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 20:22, <rashmi.a@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Rashmi A <rashmi.a@...el.com>
> >
> > Since the EMMC clock was changed from 200Mhz to 175Mhz in FIP,
> > there were some warnings introduced, as the frequency values
> > being checked was still wrt 200Mhz in code. Hence, the frequency
> > checks are now updated based on the current 175Mhz EMMC clock changed
> > in FIP.
> >
> > Spamming kernel log msg:
> > "phy phy-20290000.mmc_phy.2: Unsupported rate: 43750000"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rashmi A <rashmi.a@...el.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
>
> I guess $subject patch should be queued together with patch1/2 (via
> the mmc tree?), no?
>
> Vinod, Kishion, if that's okay I need an ack from you to pick it up.
Sure:
Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists