[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCC4_bsTEwj5+=iH-ZF3LpSzSjN-x44Yr_XU4R9=Wzq-Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:33:24 +0200
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv1 1/8] phy: amlogic: meson8b-usb2: Use clock bulk to get
clocks for phy
Hi Anand,
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 9:42 PM Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com> wrote:
[...]
> + int num_clks;
> + struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
personally I'd get rid of the num_clks as this value is static
instead I would add a #define with the number of clocks and then...
> struct reset_control *reset;
... use something like:
struct clk_bulk_data clks[MESON8B_USB2_PHY_NUM_CLKS];
[...]
> + dev_err(&phy->dev, "Failed to enable USB clock\n");
clock -> clocks
[...]
> + priv->num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(meson_phy_clks);
> + priv->clks = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, priv->num_clks,
> + sizeof(*priv->clks), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv->clks)
> + return -ENOMEM;
by using a fixed-size array as suggested above you don't need to
dynamically allocate memory anymore
Best regards,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists