[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f74c03b939dfd83a1013906e1c771666@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 01:32:52 +0530
From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, will@...nel.org,
saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org, ohad@...ery.com,
agross@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, evgreen@...omium.org,
dianders@...omium.org, swboyd@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Update reserved memory map
On 2021-06-28 23:41, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 01:17:35AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>
>> Subject: arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Update reserved memory map
>
> That's very vague. Also personally I'm not a fan of patches that touch
> SoC and board files with a commit message that only mentions the SoC,
> as
> is frequently done for IDP boards. Why not split this in (at least)
> two,
> one for adding the missing memory regions to the SoC, and one for the
> IDP.
>
sure will split this up.
>> Add missing regions and remove unused regions from the reserved memory
>> map, as described in version 1.
>
> What is this 'version 1'?
lol, it's the memory map version number
and it's not entirely internal to qc so
we have been mentioning them in commit
messages from older SoCs. I'll just drop
it when I re-spin the series since it
doesn't add much value.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists