lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:32:29 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To:     Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
        axboe@...nel.dk, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, alexs@...nel.org,
        apopple@...dia.com, willy@...radead.org, minchan@...nel.org,
        david@...hat.com, shli@...com, hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm/vmscan: fix misleading comment in
 isolate_lru_pages()

On Mon 12-07-21 19:16:47, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2021/7/12 15:28, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sat 10-07-21 18:03:29, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> >> We couldn't know whether the page is being freed elsewhere until we failed
> >> to increase the page count.
> > 
> > This is moving a hard to understand comment from one place to another.
> 
> If get_page_unless_zero failed, the page could have been freed elsewhere. I think
> this looks straightforward but doesn't help a lot. Are you preferring to just
> remove this comment ?

Yes the comment in its current form is not really helpful much. Does it
deserve a single liner to drop it? Likely not on its own without more
changes in that area.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ