[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJXN1b5Tq7uAngXfDmpTJoPvDmSzMedK3kr6efvuCgQ=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:26:38 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Chuanjia Liu <chuanjia.liu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@...iatek.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/4] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek: Update the Device
tree bindings
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:07 PM Chuanjia Liu <chuanjia.liu@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2021-07-19 at 16:47 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:34:53 +0800, Chuanjia Liu wrote:
> > > There are two independent PCIe controllers in MT2712 and MT7622
> > > platform. Each of them should contain an independent MSI domain.
> > >
> > > In old dts architecture, MSI domain will be inherited from the root
> > > bridge, and all of the devices will share the same MSI domain.
> > > Hence that, the PCIe devices will not work properly if the irq number
> > > which required is more than 32.
> > >
> > > Split the PCIe node for MT2712 and MT7622 platform to comply with
> > > the hardware design and fix MSI issue.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chuanjia Liu <chuanjia.liu@...iatek.com>
> > > Acked-by: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie-cfg.yaml | 39 ++++
> > > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie.txt | 206 ++++++++++--------
> > > 2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie-cfg.yaml
> > >
> >
> >
> > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> >
> > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> >
> Hi,Rob
> I have described in the cover letter:
> v11:Rebase for 5.14-rc1 and add "interrupt-names", "linux,pci-domain"
> description in binding file. No code change.
> if you still ok for this, I will add R-b in next version.
Yes, it's fine.
In the future, put the changelog for a patch in the patch.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists