[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQE0P9PLd3Uib7eu@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:41:03 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mika.penttila@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lirongqing@...du.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] is_core_idle() is using a wrong variable
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 09:39:46AM +0300, mika.penttila@...il.com wrote:
> From: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...il.com>
>
> is_core_idle() was using a wrong variable in the loop test. Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...il.com>
Thanks!
---
Subject: sched/numa: Fix is_core_idle()
From: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 09:39:46 +0300
From: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...il.com>
Use the loop variable instead of the function argument to test the
other SMT siblings for idle.
Fixes: ff7db0bf24db ("sched/numa: Prefer using an idle CPU as a migration target instead of comparing tasks")
Signed-off-by: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210722063946.28951-1-mika.penttila@gmail.com
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ static inline bool is_core_idle(int cpu)
if (cpu == sibling)
continue;
- if (!idle_cpu(cpu))
+ if (!idle_cpu(sibling))
return false;
}
#endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists