[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a69b82c-0ecb-51cf-ea60-1827c60bfe85@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 10:52:18 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-imx@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 2/4] nvmem: core: introduce "reverse-data" property to
reverse buffer
On 10/08/2021 08:35, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> This patch intends to introduce "reverse-data" property at nvmem
> provider side to reverse buffer.
>
> For a case used from Ethernet driver, of_get_mac_address() may call
> of_get_mac_addr_nvmem() to get MAC address from nvmem device. MAC address
> programed in imx-ocopt is MSB first in lowest address, so need reverse
Is all the data stored in imx-ocopt reverse byte order?
or someone decided to change the order for only mac-address?
> data then feedback to nvmem consumer. E.g. MAC address read from
> imx-ocopt is 98:e2:06:9f:04:00, after reversed the data is
> 00:04:9f:06:e2:98.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
> ---
> drivers/nvmem/core.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index b3bc30a04ed7..ccc2c5801c8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct nvmem_cell {
> struct device_node *np;
> struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
> struct list_head node;
> + u32 flags;
This flag also needs to go in struct nvmem_cell_info too.
> };
>
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(nvmem_mutex);
> @@ -92,6 +93,26 @@ static int __nvmem_reg_write(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, unsigned int offset,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static int nvmem_buffer_reverse(void *bufaddr, int len)
> +{
> + u8 *buf = (u8 *)bufaddr;
> + u8 *temp;
> + int i;
> +
> + temp = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!temp)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + memcpy(temp, buf, len);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> + buf[i] = temp[len - i - 1];
> +
You could possibly simplify this.
static void nvmem_buffer_reverse(u8 *buf, int len)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < len/2; i++)
swap(buf[i], buf[len - i - 1]);
}
> + kfree(temp);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int nvmem_access_with_keepouts(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
> unsigned int offset, void *val,
> size_t bytes, int write)
> @@ -705,6 +726,9 @@ static int nvmem_add_cells_from_of(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
> cell->bytes = be32_to_cpup(addr);
> cell->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOFn", child);
>
> + if (of_property_read_bool(child, "reverse-data"))
> + cell->flags |= NVMEM_FLAGS_REVERSE_DATA;
> +
> addr = of_get_property(child, "bits", &len);
> if (addr && len == (2 * sizeof(u32))) {
> cell->bit_offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
> @@ -1398,6 +1422,12 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
> if (cell->bit_offset || cell->nbits)
> nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(cell, buf);
>
> + if (cell->flags & NVMEM_FLAGS_REVERSE_DATA) {
> + rc = nvmem_buffer_reverse(buf, cell->bytes);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> if (len)
> *len = cell->bytes;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
> index 104505e9028f..364ac2a61b11 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ enum nvmem_type {
> #define NVMEM_DEVID_NONE (-1)
> #define NVMEM_DEVID_AUTO (-2)
>
> +#define NVMEM_FLAGS_REVERSE_DATA BIT(0)
Maybe NVMEM_FLAGS_REVERSE_BYTE_ORDER and some kerneldoc would help new
users.
--srini
> +
> /**
> * struct nvmem_keepout - NVMEM register keepout range.
> *
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists