lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YUDTZQ9MHl5hXas3@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:52:53 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marcus Rückert <mrueckert@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/umip: Add a umip= cmdline switch

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 02:45:03PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Strictly, this hunk does not logically belong to this patch. I guess it
> is harmless, though. Admittedly, the new line should have been there
> since umip.c was added.

Yeah, I don't like crammed code - that's why I've added it.

> Wouldn't it be better to use parse_option_str() with __setup("umip=",
> parse_umip_param)? This would avoid the first two checks.

Sure.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ