[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YUgLx7zKmD/QTCfn@builder.lan>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 23:19:19 -0500
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: add ipq4019 standalone entry
On Thu 09 Sep 01:04 CDT 2021, David Heidelberg wrote:
> It seems that some ipq4019 boards just accepted architecture.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> index 5169ebb97946..9b6dd7dc3825 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> @@ -174,6 +174,9 @@ properties:
> - qcom,ipq4019-dk04.1-c1
> - const: qcom,ipq4019
It seems reasonable to expect that the board isn't just a "qcom,ipq4019"
and in that case I believe this should cover all boards.
Please let me know if I'm misunderstanding things.
Regards,
Bjorn
>
> + - items:
> + - const: qcom,ipq4019
> +
> - items:
> - enum:
> - qcom,ipq8064-ap148
> --
> 2.33.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists