linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: add ipq4019 standalone entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <W66Q0R.AIXYHM0GGPWB3@ixit.cz>
Date:   Sat, 09 Oct 2021 21:30:32 +0200
From:   David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: add ipq4019 standalone entry

Yeah, this one patch is nonsense. Sending new patch series adding 
compatible to the IPQ40xx/AP-DK01.1-C1 instead of accepting generic 
board compatible.
David

On Sun, Sep 19 2021 at 23:19:19 -0500, Bjorn Andersson 
<bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Thu 09 Sep 01:04 CDT 2021, David Heidelberg wrote:
> 
>>  It seems that some ipq4019 boards just accepted architecture.
>> 
>>  Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
>>  ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>> 
>>  diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml 
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>>  index 5169ebb97946..9b6dd7dc3825 100644
>>  --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>>  +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>>  @@ -174,6 +174,9 @@ properties:
>>                 - qcom,ipq4019-dk04.1-c1
>>             - const: qcom,ipq4019
> 
> It seems reasonable to expect that the board isn't just a 
> "qcom,ipq4019"
> and in that case I believe this should cover all boards.
> 
> Please let me know if I'm misunderstanding things.
> 
> Regards,
> Bjorn
> 
>> 
>>  +      - items:
>>  +          - const: qcom,ipq4019
>>  +
>>         - items:
>>             - enum:
>>                 - qcom,ipq8064-ap148
>>  --
>>  2.33.0
>>