lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 16:57:23 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> Cc: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, "Cc: Len Brown" <lenb@...nel.org>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, msys.mizuma@...il.com, "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>, yangyicong <yangyicong@...wei.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Represent cluster topology and enable load balance between clusters On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 12:39:56PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Hi Barry, > > On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:32, Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Vincent, Dietmar, Peter, Ingo, > > Do you have any comment on this first series which exposes cluster topology > > of ARM64 kunpeng 920 & x86 Jacobsville and supports load balance only for > > the 1st stage? > > I will be very grateful for your comments so that things can move forward in the > > right direction. I think Tim also looks forward to bringing up cluster > > support in > > Jacobsville. > > This patchset makes sense to me and the addition of a new scheduling > level to better reflect the HW topology goes in the right direction. So I had a look, dreading the selecti-idle-sibling changes, and was pleasantly surprised they're gone :-) As is, this does indeed look like something mergable without too much hassle. The one questino I have is, do we want default y? The one nit I have is the Kconfig text, I'm not really sure that's clarifying what a cluster is.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists