linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] MIPS: Malta: fix alignment of the devicetree buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211011071553.GA24717@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:15:53 +0200
From:   Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To:     "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
Cc:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] MIPS: Malta: fix alignment of the devicetree buffer

On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 11:58:24AM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2021, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> 
> > > > Starting with following patch MIPS Malta is not able to boot:
> > > > | commit 79edff12060fe7772af08607eff50c0e2486c5ba
> > > > | Author: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > > > | scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version v1.6.0-51-g183df9e9c2b9
> > 
> > If the above patch broke malts, IMHO the fixes tag should be:
> > 
> > Fixes: 79edff12060f ("scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version v1.6.0-51-g183df9e9c2b9")
> 
>  It's not clear either from this patch description or from the commit 
> referred what the actual *purpose* of the alignment check is and therefore 
> I think it's hard to say which of the two commits needs to be indicated as 
> the offender.  Without further data I tend to agree it's 79edff12060f that 
> ought to be referred, being the immediate cause of the regression, as 
> things obviously worked before, for 5+ years.

This patch was already taken. Do I need to do any thing?

Regards,
Oleksij
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |