linux-kernel - [PATCH V2 2/2] irqchip/sifive-plic: Add thead,c9xx-plic support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211012153432.2817285-2-guoren@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 12 Oct 2021 23:34:32 +0800
From:   guoren@...nel.org
To:     guoren@...nel.org, anup@...infault.org, atish.patra@....com,
        maz@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, palmer@...belt.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 2/2] irqchip/sifive-plic: Add thead,c9xx-plic support

From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>

thead,c9xx-plic would mask IRQ with readl(claim), so it needn't
mask/unmask which needed in RISC-V PLIC.

When in IRQS_ONESHOT & IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED path, unnecessary mask
operation would cause a blocking irq bug in thead,c9xx-plic. Because
when IRQ is disabled in c9xx, writel(hwirq, claim) would be invalid.

Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>

---

Changes since V2:
 - Add a separate compatible string "thead,c9xx-plic"
 - set irq_mask/unmask of "plic_chip" to NULL and point
   irq_enable/disable of "plic_chip" to plic_irq_mask/unmask
 - Add a detailed comment block in plic_init() about the
   differences in Claim/Completion process of RISC-V PLIC and C9xx
   PLIC.
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
index cf74cfa82045..3756b1c147c3 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct plic_handler {
 };
 static int plic_parent_irq __ro_after_init;
 static bool plic_cpuhp_setup_done __ro_after_init;
+static bool disable_mask_unmask __ro_after_init;
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct plic_handler, plic_handlers);
 
 static inline void plic_toggle(struct plic_handler *handler,
@@ -181,6 +182,13 @@ static int plic_irqdomain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
 {
 	struct plic_priv *priv = d->host_data;
 
+	if (disable_mask_unmask) {
+		plic_chip.irq_mask	= NULL;
+		plic_chip.irq_unmask	= NULL;
+		plic_chip.irq_enable	= plic_irq_unmask;
+		plic_chip.irq_disable	= plic_irq_mask;
+	}
+
 	irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hwirq, &plic_chip, d->host_data,
 			    handle_fasteoi_irq, NULL, NULL);
 	irq_set_noprobe(irq);
@@ -390,5 +398,14 @@ static int __init plic_init(struct device_node *node,
 	return error;
 }
 
+static int __init thead_c9xx_plic_init(struct device_node *node,
+		struct device_node *parent)
+{
+	disable_mask_unmask = true;
+
+	return plic_init(node, parent);
+}
+
 IRQCHIP_DECLARE(sifive_plic, "sifive,plic-1.0.0", plic_init);
 IRQCHIP_DECLARE(riscv_plic0, "riscv,plic0", plic_init); /* for legacy systems */
+IRQCHIP_DECLARE(thead_c9xx_plic, "thead,c9xx-plic", thead_c9xx_plic_init);
-- 
2.25.1