lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211019151258.GA2336650@bhelgaas>
Date:   Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:12:58 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Xuesong Chen <xuesong.chen@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     catalin.marinas@....com, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
        james.morse@....com, will@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
        tony.luck@...el.com, bp@...en8.de, mingo@...nel.org,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] PCI MCFG consolidation and APEI resource filterin

On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:49:16PM +0800, Xuesong Chen wrote:
> Hello All,
> 
> The idea of this patch set is very strainforward, it's somehow a refactor
> of the original codes to share some ones that they should do. Based on that,
> we can resolve the MCFG address access issue in APEI module on x86 in a 
> command way instead of the current arch-dependent one, while this issue also
> does happen on ARM64 platform.
> 
> The logic of the series is very clear(IMO it's even time-wasting to explain that):

If you want people to look at and care about your changes, it is never
a waste of time to explain them.

> Patch #1: Escalating the 'pci_mmcfg_list' and 'pci_mmcfg_region' to the
> pci.[c,h] which will shared by all the arches. A common sense, in some degree.
> 
> Patch #2: Since the 'pci_mmcfg_list' now can be shared across all arches,
> the arch-specific fix method can be replaced by the new solution naturally.
> 
> Now the v3 patch has been finalized, can we move forward to the next step? -
> either give the concerns/objections or pick it up.

It's helpful to your reviewers if you include a note about changes
between v2 and v3, as you did in your v2 0/2 cover letter.

It's also helpful if you thread the series with patches 1 and 2 as
responses to the cover letter.  That makes it easy to download the
patches using b4.  Here's a little more background:

  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst?id=v5.14#n320

> Xuesong Chen (2):
>   PCI: MCFG: Consolidate the separate PCI MCFG table entry list
>   ACPI: APEI: Filter the PCI MCFG address with an arch-agnostic method
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h | 17 +---------------
>  arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c | 30 ----------------------------
>  drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c  | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c        | 34 ++++++++++++-------------------
>  drivers/pci/pci.c              |  2 ++
>  include/linux/pci.h            | 17 ++++++++++++++++
>  6 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ