lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:13:14 +0900
From:   William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
To:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
Cc:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] counter/ti-eqep: implement over/underflow events

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 08:33:36PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> This adds support to the TI eQEP counter driver for subscribing to
> overflow and underflow events using the counter chrdev interface.
> 
> Since this is the first event added, this involved adding an irq
> handler. Also, additional range checks had to be added to the ceiling
> attribute to avoid infinite interrupts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>

Hi David,

This looks functionally okay, but I have a couple minor comments inline.

> ---
>  drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 117 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c b/drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c
> index 09817c953f9a..b7c79435e127 100644
> --- a/drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c
> +++ b/drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
>  #include <linux/counter.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -67,6 +68,44 @@
>  #define QEPCTL_UTE		BIT(1)
>  #define QEPCTL_WDE		BIT(0)
>  
> +#define QEINT_UTO		BIT(11)
> +#define QEINT_IEL		BIT(10)
> +#define QEINT_SEL		BIT(9)
> +#define QEINT_PCM		BIT(8)
> +#define QEINT_PCR		BIT(7)
> +#define QEINT_PCO		BIT(6)
> +#define QEINT_PCU		BIT(5)
> +#define QEINT_WTO		BIT(4)
> +#define QEINT_QDC		BIT(3)
> +#define QEINT_PHE		BIT(2)
> +#define QEINT_PCE		BIT(1)
> +
> +#define QFLG_UTO		BIT(11)
> +#define QFLG_IEL		BIT(10)
> +#define QFLG_SEL		BIT(9)
> +#define QFLG_PCM		BIT(8)
> +#define QFLG_PCR		BIT(7)
> +#define QFLG_PCO		BIT(6)
> +#define QFLG_PCU		BIT(5)
> +#define QFLG_WTO		BIT(4)
> +#define QFLG_QDC		BIT(3)
> +#define QFLG_PHE		BIT(2)
> +#define QFLG_PCE		BIT(1)
> +#define QFLG_INT		BIT(0)
> +
> +#define QCLR_UTO		BIT(11)
> +#define QCLR_IEL		BIT(10)
> +#define QCLR_SEL		BIT(9)
> +#define QCLR_PCM		BIT(8)
> +#define QCLR_PCR		BIT(7)
> +#define QCLR_PCO		BIT(6)
> +#define QCLR_PCU		BIT(5)
> +#define QCLR_WTO		BIT(4)
> +#define QCLR_QDC		BIT(3)
> +#define QCLR_PHE		BIT(2)
> +#define QCLR_PCE		BIT(1)
> +#define QCLR_INT		BIT(0)
> +
>  /* EQEP Inputs */
>  enum {
>  	TI_EQEP_SIGNAL_QEPA,	/* QEPA/XCLK */
> @@ -233,12 +272,46 @@ static int ti_eqep_action_read(struct counter_device *counter,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static int ti_eqep_events_configure(struct counter_device *counter)
> +{
> +	struct ti_eqep_cnt *priv = counter->priv;
> +	struct counter_event_node *event_node;
> +	u32 qeint = 0;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(event_node, &counter->events_list, l) {
> +		switch (event_node->event) {
> +		case COUNTER_EVENT_OVERFLOW:
> +			qeint |= QEINT_PCO;
> +			break;
> +		case COUNTER_EVENT_UNDERFLOW:
> +			qeint |= QEINT_PCU;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return regmap_write_bits(priv->regmap16, QEINT, ~0, qeint);
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_eqep_watch_validate(struct counter_device *counter,
> +				  const struct counter_watch *watch)
> +{
> +	switch (watch->event) {
> +	case COUNTER_EVENT_OVERFLOW:
> +	case COUNTER_EVENT_UNDERFLOW:
> +		return 0;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static const struct counter_ops ti_eqep_counter_ops = {
>  	.count_read	= ti_eqep_count_read,
>  	.count_write	= ti_eqep_count_write,
>  	.function_read	= ti_eqep_function_read,
>  	.function_write	= ti_eqep_function_write,
>  	.action_read	= ti_eqep_action_read,
> +	.events_configure = ti_eqep_events_configure,
> +	.watch_validate	= ti_eqep_watch_validate,
>  };
>  
>  static int ti_eqep_position_ceiling_read(struct counter_device *counter,
> @@ -260,11 +333,17 @@ static int ti_eqep_position_ceiling_write(struct counter_device *counter,
>  					  u64 ceiling)
>  {
>  	struct ti_eqep_cnt *priv = counter->priv;
> +	u32 qposmax = ceiling;
>  
> -	if (ceiling != (u32)ceiling)
> +	/* ensure that value fits in 32-bit register */
> +	if (qposmax != ceiling)
>  		return -ERANGE;
>  
> -	regmap_write(priv->regmap32, QPOSMAX, ceiling);
> +	/* protect against infinite overflow interrupts */
> +	if (qposmax == 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;

Would you be able to explain this scenario a bit further? My expectation
would be that an overflow event would only occur if the position
increased past the ceiling (i.e. increased to greater than 0). Of
course, running the device with a ceiling of 0 effectively guarantees
overflow eventss with every movement, but I would expect a stationary
device to sit with a position of 0 and thus no overflow events.

> +
> +	regmap_write(priv->regmap32, QPOSMAX, qposmax);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -349,6 +428,25 @@ static struct counter_count ti_eqep_counts[] = {
>  	},
>  };
>  
> +static irqreturn_t ti_eqep_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct ti_eqep_cnt *priv = dev_id;
> +	struct counter_device *counter = &priv->counter;
> +	u32 qflg;
> +
> +	regmap_read(priv->regmap16, QFLG, &qflg);
> +
> +	if (qflg & QFLG_PCO)
> +		counter_push_event(counter, COUNTER_EVENT_OVERFLOW, 0);
> +
> +	if (qflg & QFLG_PCU)
> +		counter_push_event(counter, COUNTER_EVENT_UNDERFLOW, 0);
> +
> +	regmap_set_bits(priv->regmap16, QCLR, ~0);

I agree with Jonathan here, it looks like this is unconditionally
clearing all interrupt flags but it's possible new ones could have
appear between the time after you read QFLG to here. Is it possible to
clear just the interrupt flags you've handled here instead of all?

William Breathitt Gray

> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct regmap_config ti_eqep_regmap32_config = {
>  	.name = "32-bit",
>  	.reg_bits = 32,
> @@ -371,6 +469,7 @@ static int ti_eqep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct ti_eqep_cnt *priv;
>  	void __iomem *base;
>  	int err;
> +	int irq;
>  
>  	priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!priv)
> @@ -390,6 +489,15 @@ static int ti_eqep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (IS_ERR(priv->regmap16))
>  		return PTR_ERR(priv->regmap16);
>  
> +	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> +	if (irq < 0)
> +		return irq;
> +
> +	err = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, ti_eqep_irq_handler,
> +					IRQF_ONESHOT, dev_name(dev), priv);
> +	if (err < 0)
> +		return err;
> +
>  	priv->counter.name = dev_name(dev);
>  	priv->counter.parent = dev;
>  	priv->counter.ops = &ti_eqep_counter_ops;
> @@ -409,6 +517,13 @@ static int ti_eqep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>  	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * We can end up with an interupt infinite loop (interrupts triggered
> +	 * as soon as they are cleared) if we leave this at the default value
> +	 * of 0 and events are enabled.
> +	 */
> +	regmap_write(priv->regmap32, QPOSMAX, UINT_MAX);
> +
>  	err = counter_register(&priv->counter);
>  	if (err < 0) {
>  		pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ