[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d951b30-8298-b739-51c4-13cb2de741b9@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:18:49 +0530
From: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, agross@...nel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, bgoswami@...eaurora.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, judyhsiao@...omium.org,
lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, perex@...ex.cz, plai@...eaurora.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, rohitkr@...eaurora.org,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, tiwai@...e.com
Cc: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SC7280 lpass pin configuration
On 10/7/2021 11:24 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-10-07 06:48:39)
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
>> index c0117c5..0b68065 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
>> @@ -237,6 +264,15 @@ static struct lpi_pinctrl_variant_data sm8250_lpi_data = {
>> .nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(lpass_functions),
>> };
>>
>> +static struct lpi_pinctrl_variant_data sc7280_lpi_data = {
> Can this variant data be const?
Okay. Will change accordingly.
>> + .pins = lpass_lpi_pins,
>> + .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(lpass_lpi_pins),
>> + .groups = sc7280_groups,
>> + .ngroups = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7280_groups),
>> + .functions = lpass_functions,
>> + .nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(lpass_functions),
>> +};
>> +
>> static int lpi_gpio_read(struct lpi_pinctrl *state, unsigned int pin,
>> unsigned int addr)
>> {
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.,
is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists