linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add sc7280 lpass lpi pinctrl compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE-0n537neZdwb3vP4=8N5vj0EwYnDnA-U7O=fckPvP52baCrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:22:01 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@...eaurora.org>,
        agross@...nel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        bgoswami@...eaurora.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        broonie@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        judyhsiao@...omium.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        perex@...ex.cz, plai@...eaurora.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        rohitkr@...eaurora.org, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
        tiwai@...e.com
Cc:     Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add sc7280 lpass lpi
 pinctrl compatible

Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-10-27 00:47:52)
>
> On 10/7/2021 11:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-10-07 06:48:38)
> >> Add device tree binding compatible name for Qualcomm SC7280 LPASS LPI pinctrl driver.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@...eaurora.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@...eaurora.org>
> >> ---
> >>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml | 4 +++-
> >>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml
> >> index e47ebf9..578b283 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml
> >> @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ description: |
> >>
> >>   properties:
> >>     compatible:
> >> -    const: qcom,sm8250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl
> >> +    enum:
> >> +      - qcom,sc7280-lpass-lpi-pinctrl
> >> +      - qcom,sm8250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl
> > I suspect we need to split the binding because the function list needs
> > to change. Can you make a whole new file that's probably largely a copy
> > of this file and/or extract the common bits into a meta schema and
> > include that in both the files? Then the function list can be different
> > and the clock property can be omitted in the sc7280 file.
>
> As most are common functions and fixed number of LPASS Lpi pin
> configuration across platforms,
>
> Only diff is ADSP bypass platforms 2 clocks are optional. Otherwise
> clock design also same for SC7280 and SM8250 based architecture.
>
> So I feel Keeping common file is better for now.

I don't agree. We want to be very strict about what is exposed. It needs
to match exactly what is supported on the SoC, not be a superset of it.