linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Add Sunplus SP7021 SoC Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8735oc9voy.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 04 Nov 2021 08:22:37 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Qin Jian <qinjian@...lus1.com>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        p.zabel@...gutronix.de, linux@...linux.org.uk, broonie@...nel.org,
        arnd@...db.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, wells.lu@...plus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Add Sunplus SP7021 SoC Support

Qin,

On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 02:56:57 +0000,
Qin Jian <qinjian@...lus1.com> wrote:
> 
> This patch series add Sunplus SP7021 SoC support.
> 
> Sunplus SP7021 is an ARM Cortex A7 (4 cores) based SoC. It integrates many
> peripherals (ex: UART, I2C, SPI, SDIO, eMMC, USB, SD card and etc.) into a
> single chip. It is designed for industrial control.
> 
> SP7021 consists of two chips (dies) in a package. One is called C-chip
> (computing chip). It is a 4-core ARM Cortex A7 CPU. It adopts high-level
> process (22 nm) for high performance computing. The other is called P-
> chip (peripheral chip). It has many peripherals and an ARM A926 added
> especially for real-time control. P-chip is made for customers. It adopts
> low-level process (ex: 0.11 um) to reduce cost.

That's the 3rd version of this series since Friday, two of them during
the merge window. All you are achieving is to actually *delay* the
review process (at this rate, I'll probably wait until v11 before I
take another look at it).

Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst states it clearly:

<quote>
Wait for a minimum of one week before resubmitting
</quote>

So please leave people the time to actually do a good review job, and
take the opportunity to review your own patches before posting them
again.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.