linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: designware: Fix the kernel doc description for struct dw_i2c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YZJ8FPDDQ4PqDtTF@shikoro>
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 16:26:12 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: designware: Fix the kernel doc description
 for struct dw_i2c_dev


> > Yes, I am aware of what is in the spec.
> 
> Wolfram, what do you prefer?

I prefer I2C. But it is more a reading habit. I would neither enforce
I2C nor I²C.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)