linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: designware: Fix the kernel doc description for struct dw_i2c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <767f36e9-e043-06dd-f847-7405524b432e@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 07:46:42 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: designware: Fix the kernel doc description
 for struct dw_i2c_dev

On 11/12/21 8:43 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/12/21 8:26 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:01 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>>> On 11/12/21 4:34 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>> + * @rinfo: I²C GPIO recovery information
>>>
>>> Preferably:   "I2C"
>>
>> Why?
> 
> See below vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv:
>>> like it is in thousands of places in the kernel source tree.
> 
> 
>> UTF-8 has been established for more than a decade. I prefer to use the
>> proper form of the abbreviation (*).
>>
>> *) Check UM10204.pdf.


> > Yes, I am aware of what is in the spec.
> 
> Wolfram, what do you prefer?

>I prefer I2C. But it is more a reading habit. I would neither enforce
>I2C nor I²C.

OK, let's leave it as Andy sent it then.

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunla@...radead.org>


-- 
~Randy