[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZVX9R/TMvkPwuuF@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 21:28:53 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Anand Ashok Dumbre <ANANDASH@...inx.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, git <git@...inx.com>,
Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
rafael@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer for xilinx-ams
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 10:46:20AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On 2021-11-17 09:08, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 6:05 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> > > What do you think checkpatch is supposed to find?
>
> > To me AMS should precede AXI and not the other way around. Agree?
>
> Sure but checkpatch just looks at patches and doesn't inspect the patched
> file, apply the patch then look at the result. The patch itself looks fine.
I see, checkpatch simply doesn't have such functionality and maintainers should
ask people to rung parse-maintainers.pl from time to timeā¦
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists