linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer for xilinx-ams

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <164612d20b252a28dda74f5058e0aacb@perches.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:46:20 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Anand Ashok Dumbre <ANANDASH@...inx.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, git <git@...inx.com>,
        Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        rafael@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer for xilinx-ams

On 2021-11-17 09:08, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 6:05 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:

>> What do you think checkpatch is supposed to find?

> To me AMS should precede AXI and not the other way around. Agree?

Sure but checkpatch just looks at patches and doesn't inspect the 
patched file, apply the patch then look at the result. The patch itself 
looks fine.