linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer for xilinx-ams

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VfJBwCcFwbv6fgvwf=Q1UdFXwgNex-4GqKLcf=ZhuqGjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Nov 2021 19:08:41 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Anand Ashok Dumbre <ANANDASH@...inx.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
        "lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
        "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        git <git@...inx.com>, Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer for xilinx-ams

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 6:05 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-11-17 at 17:17 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 5:00 PM Anand Ashok Dumbre <ANANDASH@...inx.com> wrote:
> > > > From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday 16 November 2021 5:42 PM
> > > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 03:08:42PM +0000, Anand Ashok Dumbre wrote:

...

> > > > Have you run checkpatch?
> > >
> > > Yes I did.
> > > I don't see any error on this.
> >
> > Hmm... Perhaps it needs an unobvious parameter?
> > Joe, X is definitely after M, any idea why checkpatch hasn't caught this up?
>
> This is the suggested patch below right?

Correct.

> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211116150842.1051-6-anand.ashok.dumbre@xilinx.com/
>
> It looks OK to me.

How come? See below.

> What do you think checkpatch is supposed to find?

XILINX AXI ETHERNET DRIVER
M:      Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>
S:      Maintained
F:      drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_axienet*

--> patch adds XILINX AMS DRIVER here !!!

XILINX CAN DRIVER

To me AMS should precede AXI and not the other way around. Agree?

> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -20640,6 +20640,13 @@ M:     Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>
>  S:     Maintained
>  F:     drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_axienet*
>
> +XILINX AMS DRIVER
> +M:     Anand Ashok Dumbre <anand.ashok.dumbre@...inx.com>
> +L:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
> +S:     Maintained
> +F:     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/xlnx,zynqmp-ams.yaml
> +F:     drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c
> +
>  XILINX CAN DRIVER
>  M:     Appana Durga Kedareswara rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>
>  R:     Naga Sureshkumar Relli <naga.sureshkumar.relli@...inx.com>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko