linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] PCI: brcmstb: Use BIT() as _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YaecakqeoSPoqq4k@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Dec 2021 18:01:46 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc:     bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] PCI: brcmstb: Use BIT() as __GENMASK() is for
 internal use only

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 03:53:21PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 13:20:00 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Use BIT() as __GENMASK() is for internal use only. The rationale
> > of switching to BIT() is to provide better generated code. The
> > GENMASK() against non-constant numbers may produce an ugly assembler
> > code. On contrary the BIT() is simply converted to corresponding shift
> > operation.
> > 
> > Note, it's the only user of __GENMASK() in the kernel outside of its own realm.
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied to pci/brcmstb, thanks!
> 
> [1/1] PCI: brcmstb: Use BIT() as __GENMASK() is for internal use only
>       https://git.kernel.org/lpieralisi/pci/c/6ec6eb949d

Thanks, but there is another patch which changes the logic a bit and cleans up
more.

  From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
  Subject: [PATCH] PCI: brcmstb: Do not use __GENMASK

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko