linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6655: refactor byMinChannel to min

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 4 Dec 2021 10:09:41 +0100
From:   Alberto Merciai <alb3rt0.m3rciai@...il.com>
To:     Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
Cc:     Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@...il.com>,
        Aldas Taraškevičius <aldas60@...il.com>,
        Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@...il.com>,
        Lucas Henneman <lucas.henneman@...aro.org>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6655: refactor byMinChannel to min_channel

On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 11:27:43AM +0300, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> Looks like this variable is set, but never used. Shouldn't it be just
> removed?
> 
> Same for max_channel (or byMaxChannel).

To be honest, I would prefer leave them where they are. I'm only
refactoring the code considering less the logic aspect.

I don't know if these variables will become usefull in a second
moment.

Anyway, If you consider that this could be a good moment to remove
them we can proceed.

What do you think about that?

Thanks,
Alberto