[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YcGfky32lSXeABEF@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:34:11 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] software node: fix wrong node passed to find nargs_prop
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:37:07PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> Thanks Andy
>
> On 20/12/2021 22:13, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > + Sakari, Dan
> >
> > On Monday, December 20, 2021, Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com
> > <mailto:clement.leger@...tlin.com>> wrote:
> >
> > nargs_prop refers to a property located in the reference that is found
> > within the nargs property.
>
> I think this is right (it's not used in the ACPI version, and the OF
> version is quite convoluted so a bit hard to follow)...but also I note
> that none of the users of fwnode_property_get_reference_args() pass
> anything to nargs_prop anyway...do we even need this?
Looks like it is unused, please just remove it.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists