[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d9b4f08-967e-6040-a954-e7bfa7e4dce1@opensource.wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:52:09 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: pata_ali: remove redundant return statement
On 1/13/22 08:47, Colin Ian King wrote:
> A return statement is unnecessarily complicated, currently value
> in variable mask is bitwise-masked and the variable is being
> updated and then returned. Just updating the mask is all that is
> required as the following statement is a return.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/ata/pata_ali.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_ali.c b/drivers/ata/pata_ali.c
> index ab28a6707b94..1b90cda27246 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_ali.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_ali.c
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static unsigned long ali_20_filter(struct ata_device *adev, unsigned long mask)
> mask &= ~(ATA_MASK_MWDMA | ATA_MASK_UDMA);
> ata_id_c_string(adev->id, model_num, ATA_ID_PROD, sizeof(model_num));
> if (strstr(model_num, "WDC"))
> - return mask &= ~ATA_MASK_UDMA;
Yeah, not to mention that is really ugly as the return should really
have been:
return mask & ~ATA_MASK_UDMA;
> + mask &= ~ATA_MASK_UDMA;
> return mask;
> }
>
Will queue this up.
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists