linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 64/66] nommu: Remove uses of VMA linked list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YemFpinGspNII+hl@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:54:14 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:     Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>,
        "maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org" <maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Michel Lespinasse <walken.cr@...il.com>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...gle.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Rom Lemarchand <romlem@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 64/66] nommu: Remove uses of VMA linked list

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 04:06:21PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 12/1/21 15:30, Liam Howlett wrote:
> > From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
> > 
> > Use the maple tree or VMA iterator instead.  This is faster and will
> > allow us to shrink the VMA.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> 
> But I think some fixup needed:
> 
> > @@ -1456,12 +1458,14 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >  
> >  	mm->total_vm = 0;
> >  
> > -	while ((vma = mm->mmap)) {
> > -		mm->mmap = vma->vm_next;
> > +	mmap_write_lock(mm);
> 
> If locking was missing, should have been added sooner than now?

I don't think so?  This is the exit_mmap() path, so we know nobody
has access to the mm.  We didn't need to hold the lock at this point
before, but now for_each_vma() will check we're holding the mmap_lock.

> > +	for_each_vma(vmi, vma) {
> >  		delete_vma_from_mm(vma);
> >  		delete_vma(mm, vma);
> >  		cond_resched();
> >  	}
> > +	__mt_destroy(&mm->mm_mt);
> 
> And this at the point mm_mt was added?

You mean we should have been calling __mt_destroy() earlier in the
patch series?  Umm ... I'll defer to Liam on that one.