linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] memblock: Remove unused io.h include

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YflRJZV94Mx6lKAG@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:26:29 +0200
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To:     Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memblock: Remove unused io.h include

Hi Karolina,

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 01:17:23PM +0100, Karolina Drobnik wrote:
> Memblock does not use anything from io.h, remove the include.

As Matthew pointed out [1], many architectures put their definition of
virt_to_phys() in asm/io.h, e.g. 

arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:#define virt_to_phys virt_to_phys
arch/sh/include/asm/io.h:#define virt_to_phys(address)  ((unsigned long)(address))
arch/x86/include/asm/io.h:#define virt_to_phys virt_to_phys

which means memblock needs this header for declaration of virt_to_phys().

Although it is included indirectly, let's keep it for now.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/YfbQlMyohx31FhSW@casper.infradead.org/
 
> Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@...il.com>
> ---
>  mm/memblock.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 1018e50566f3..4ee190b3f026 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
>  #include <linux/memblock.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/sections.h>
> -#include <linux/io.h>
>  
>  #include "internal.h"
>  
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.