[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgwvoaJj5BqpMOiR@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 22:56:33 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>,
SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/13] mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch
by pagevec
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 01:02:30PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > +#define mlock_new(page) ((struct page *)((unsigned long)page + NEW_PAGE))
> >
> > I'm going to change this to:
> >
> > static inline struct page *mlock_lru(struct page *page)
> > {
> > return (struct page *)((unsigned long)page + LRU_PAGE);
> > }
> >
> > (mutatis mutandi for mlock_new)
>
> Okay, thanks. (You're not naming your folio "page" :-?)
Worse, I tried passing it '&folio->page'. That produced some ...
interesting compiler error messages.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists