linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/amd_nb: unexport amd_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7e96b7e9-55d9-0354-80cb-dd1c6fef618b@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Mar 2022 21:48:25 +0530
From:   "Chatradhi, Naveen Krishna" <nchatrad@....com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
        airlied@...ux.ie, Muralidhara M K <muralimk@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/amd_nb: unexport amd_cache_northbridges()


On 3/23/2022 9:01 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> [CAUTION: External Email]
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 08:54:20PM +0530, Chatradhi, Naveen Krishna wrote:
>> Modules that are using this API comes after the fs_initcall() is called.
> I don't need you to explain this to me - I need you to:
>
> "What I am missing in this commit message is why is it ok to do that?"
>
> I.e., pls explain in the commit message exactly why it is ok to do that
> so that people who read it, will know.
Got it, thanks. I will update the commit message.
>
> Thx.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
>      Boris.
>
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpeople.kernel.org%2Ftglx%2Fnotes-about-netiquette&amp;data=04%7C01%7CNaveenKrishna.Chatradhi%40amd.com%7Cb0cc43042e1d4b9cdb7208da0ce2419b%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637836463172288920%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=v4zF2o2W33F1rCEg6e0ZZRRqpvxM4BwkvtGSgGSY5cU%3D&amp;reserved=0