linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc: clean up comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YlQeEC41m3UeOeiE@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Apr 2022 14:24:48 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        balbi@...nel.org, joel@....id.au, andrew@...id.au,
        nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com, alcooperx@...il.com,
        christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr, cai.huoqing@...ux.dev,
        benh@...nel.crashing.org, neal_liu@...eedtech.com,
        miles.chen@...iatek.com, balamanikandan.gunasundar@...rochip.com,
        macpaul.lin@...iatek.com, s.shtylyov@....ru,
        jakobkoschel@...il.com, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
        quic_wcheng@...cinc.com, yashsri421@...il.com,
        rdunlap@...radead.org, linux-geode@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc: clean up comments

On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 04:49:00AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
> 
> On 4/11/22 3:22 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 11:08:28AM -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
> > > SPDX
> > > *.h use /* */ style comments
> > > 
> > > For double words, remove
> > > with, also
> > > 
> > > Spelling replacements
> > > wayt to way
> > > wakup to wakeup
> > > Contrl to Control
> > > cheks to checks
> > > initiaization to initialization
> > > dyanmic to dynamic
> > Something really wrong with indentation above.
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > >   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/amd5536udc.h       | 2 +-
> > >   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/core.c | 2 +-
> > >   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/ep0.c  | 2 +-
> > >   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/hub.c  | 2 +-
> > >   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/vhub.h | 4 ++--
> > >   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c         | 2 +-
> > >   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/bdc/bdc_core.c     | 4 ++--
> > >   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c             | 4 ++--
> > >   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/trace.h            | 2 +-
> > I believe that Greg's bot asks to split on per-driver basis.
> > OTOH I don't see anything that can be problematic if in one
> > change. So, it's up to maintainers then.
> 
> Yes, whatever folks want. I can split these.
> 
> I have been cleaning up the comments in other areas and am trying to strike
> a balance between too big of a patch vs peppering with many single changes.

Patch series are much easier to review and is just as simple to apply as
a single patch, so that makes it overall better for you to do.

thanks,

greg k-h