| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 21:25:03 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/21] ata: libahci: Discard redundant force_port_map
parameter
On 4/11/22 21:11, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 11:05:58AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 3/24/22 09:16, Serge Semin wrote:
>>> Currently there are four port-map-related fields declared in the
>>> ahci_host_priv structure and used to setup the HBA ports mapping. First
>>> the ports-mapping is read from the PI register and immediately stored in
>>> the saved_port_map field. If forced_port_map is initialized with non-zero
>>> value then its value will have greater priority over the value read from
>>> PI, thus it will override the saved_port_map field. That value will be then
>>> masked by a non-zero mask_port_map field and after some sanity checks it
>>> will be stored in the ahci_host_priv.port_map field as a final port
>>> mapping.
>>>
>>> As you can see the logic is a bit too complicated for such a simple task.
>>> We can freely get rid from at least one of the fields with no change to
>>> the implemented semantic. The force_port_map field can be replaced with
>>> taking non-zero saved_port_map value into account. So if saved_port_map is
>>> pre-initialized by the glue-driver/platform-specific code then it will
>>
>
>> glue-driver == LLDD (low level device driver), for the entire series please.
>
> Why? It's a normal term and well known amongst developers. I've used it
> in a plenty of my patches before and none of them has been questioned in that
> part so far.
This term is not used in libata, nor do I remember seeing it used in SCSI
or block subsystem either. We always talk about mid-layer (ahci platform)
and LLDD (adapter driver).
>
> -Sergey
>
>>
>>> have greater priority over the value read from PI register and will be
>>> used as actual HBA ports mapping later on. Thus the ports map forcing task
>>> will be just transferred from the force_port_map to saved_port_map field.
>>>
>>> This modification will perfectly fit into the feature of having OF-based
>>> initialization of the HW-init HBA CSR fields we are about to introduce in
>>> the next commit.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/ata/ahci.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/ata/ahci.h | 1 -
>>> drivers/ata/libahci.c | 10 ++++++----
>>> drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c | 2 +-
>>> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
>>> index ab5811ef5a53..8ce0d166cc8d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
>>> @@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ static void ahci_pci_save_initial_config(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>> {
>>> if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_JMICRON && pdev->device == 0x2361) {
>>> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "JMB361 has only one port\n");
>>> - hpriv->force_port_map = 1;
>>> + hpriv->saved_port_map = 1;
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.h b/drivers/ata/ahci.h
>>> index 04690b4168a3..519d148ecaea 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.h
>>> @@ -329,7 +329,6 @@ struct ahci_port_priv {
>>> struct ahci_host_priv {
>>> /* Input fields */
>>> unsigned int flags; /* AHCI_HFLAG_* */
>>> - u32 force_port_map; /* force port map */
>>> u32 mask_port_map; /* mask out particular bits */
>>>
>>> void __iomem * mmio; /* bus-independent mem map */
>>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci.c b/drivers/ata/libahci.c
>>> index 0ed484e04fd6..011175e82174 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/ata/libahci.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/ata/libahci.c
>>> @@ -453,7 +453,6 @@ void ahci_save_initial_config(struct device *dev, struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv)
>>> * reset. Values without are used for driver operation.
>>> */
>>> hpriv->saved_cap = cap = readl(mmio + HOST_CAP);
>>> - hpriv->saved_port_map = port_map = readl(mmio + HOST_PORTS_IMPL);
>>>
>>> /* CAP2 register is only defined for AHCI 1.2 and later */
>>> vers = readl(mmio + HOST_VERSION);
>>> @@ -517,10 +516,13 @@ void ahci_save_initial_config(struct device *dev, struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv)
>>> cap &= ~HOST_CAP_SXS;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (hpriv->force_port_map && port_map != hpriv->force_port_map) {
>>> + /* Override the HBA ports mapping if the platform needs it */
>>> + port_map = readl(mmio + HOST_PORTS_IMPL);
>>> + if (hpriv->saved_port_map && port_map != hpriv->saved_port_map) {
>>> dev_info(dev, "forcing port_map 0x%x -> 0x%x\n",
>>> - port_map, hpriv->force_port_map);
>>> - port_map = hpriv->force_port_map;
>>> + port_map, hpriv->saved_port_map);
>>> + port_map = hpriv->saved_port_map;
>>> + } else {
>>> hpriv->saved_port_map = port_map;
>>> }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
>>> index febad33aa43c..5cbc2c42164d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
>>> @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ struct ahci_host_priv *ahci_platform_get_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>> }
>>>
>>> of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node,
>>> - "ports-implemented", &hpriv->force_port_map);
>>> + "ports-implemented", &hpriv->saved_port_map);
>>>
>>> if (child_nodes) {
>>> for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) {
>>
>>
>> --
>> Damien Le Moal
>> Western Digital Research
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists