lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63068c6c-ae60-078b-0a9e-70f1dfd8362c@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:20:37 +0800
From:   "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
To:     "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        "like.xu.linux@...il.com" <like.xu.linux@...il.com>,
        "vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@...el.com>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 07/16] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL for
 guest Arch LBR


On 4/28/2022 10:16 PM, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
> On 4/22/2022 3:55 AM, Yang Weijiang wrote:
>> From: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> Arch LBR is enabled by setting MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL.LBREn to 1. A new guest
>> state field named "Guest IA32_LBR_CTL" is added to enhance guest LBR usage.
>> When guest Arch LBR is enabled, a guest LBR event will be created like the
>> model-specific LBR does. Clear guest LBR enable bit on host PMI handling so
>> guest can see expected config.
>>
>> On processors that support Arch LBR, MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR[bit 0] has no
>> meaning. It can be written to 0 or 1, but reads will always return 0.
>> Like IA32_DEBUGCTL, IA32_ARCH_LBR_CTL msr is also preserved on INIT.
>>
>> Regardless of the Arch LBR or legacy LBR, when the LBR_EN bit 0 of the
>> corresponding control MSR is set to 1, LBR recording will be enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
>> ---
>>    arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c      |  2 --
>>    arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h |  1 +
>>    arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h       |  2 ++
>>    arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c     | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>    arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c           | 12 +++++++
>>    5 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
>> index 4529ce448b2e..4fe6c3b50fc3 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
>> @@ -160,8 +160,6 @@ enum {
>>    	 ARCH_LBR_RETURN		|\
>>    	 ARCH_LBR_OTHER_BRANCH)
>>    
>> -#define ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK			0x7f000e
>> -
>>    static void intel_pmu_lbr_filter(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc);
>>    
>>    static __always_inline bool is_lbr_call_stack_bit_set(u64 config)
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
>> index 0eb90d21049e..60e0ab108dc0 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
>> @@ -169,6 +169,7 @@
>>    #define LBR_INFO_BR_TYPE		(0xfull << LBR_INFO_BR_TYPE_OFFSET)
>>    
>>    #define MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL		0x000014ce
>> +#define ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK		0x7f000e
>>    #define ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN		BIT(0)
>>    #define ARCH_LBR_CTL_CPL_OFFSET		1
>>    #define ARCH_LBR_CTL_CPL		(0x3ull << ARCH_LBR_CTL_CPL_OFFSET)
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
>> index 0ffaa3156a4e..ea3be961cc8e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
>> @@ -245,6 +245,8 @@ enum vmcs_field {
>>    	GUEST_BNDCFGS_HIGH              = 0x00002813,
>>    	GUEST_IA32_RTIT_CTL		= 0x00002814,
>>    	GUEST_IA32_RTIT_CTL_HIGH	= 0x00002815,
>> +	GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL		= 0x00002816,
>> +	GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL_HIGH		= 0x00002817,
>>    	HOST_IA32_PAT			= 0x00002c00,
>>    	HOST_IA32_PAT_HIGH		= 0x00002c01,
>>    	HOST_IA32_EFER			= 0x00002c02,
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
>> index c8e6c1e1e00c..7dc8a5783df7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>    #include "pmu.h"
>>    
>>    #define MSR_PMC_FULL_WIDTH_BIT      (MSR_IA32_PMC0 - MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)
>> +#define KVM_ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK  (ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK | ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN)
>>    
>>    static struct kvm_event_hw_type_mapping intel_arch_events[] = {
>>    	[0] = { 0x3c, 0x00, PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES },
>> @@ -215,6 +216,7 @@ static bool intel_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
>>    		ret = pmu->version > 1;
>>    		break;
>>    	case MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH:
>> +	case MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL:
>>    		if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
>>    			ret = guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR);
>>    		break;
>> @@ -361,6 +363,35 @@ static bool arch_lbr_depth_is_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 depth)
>>    	return (depth == pmu->kvm_arch_lbr_depth);
>>    }
>>    
>> +#define ARCH_LBR_CTL_BRN_MASK   GENMASK_ULL(22, 16)
>> +
>> +static bool arch_lbr_ctl_is_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 ctl)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry;
>> +
>> +	if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	if (ctl & ~KVM_ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK)
>> +		goto warn;
>> +
>> +	entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x1c, 0);
>> +	if (!entry)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	if (!(entry->ebx & BIT(0)) && (ctl & ARCH_LBR_CTL_CPL))
>> +		return false;
>> +	if (!(entry->ebx & BIT(2)) && (ctl & ARCH_LBR_CTL_STACK))
>> +		return false;
>> +	if (!(entry->ebx & BIT(1)) && (ctl & ARCH_LBR_CTL_BRN_MASK))
> Why KVM wants to define this mask by itself? Cannot we use the
> ARCH_LBR_CTL_FILTER?

Thanks Ken for review!

Sounds like the ISE has been updated, per section "CPUID for Ach LBRs":

EBX 1 Branch Filtering Supported If set, the processor supports setting 
IA32_LBR_CTL[22:16] to non-zero value.

but the FILTER definition looks like:

#define ARCH_LBR_CTL_FILTER_OFFSET      16

#define ARCH_LBR_CTL_FILTER             (0x7full << 
ARCH_LBR_CTL_FILTER_OFFSET)

Maybe I need to update the FILTER and re-use it.

>
> Thanks,
> Kan
>
>> +		return false;
>> +	return true;
>> +warn:
>> +	pr_warn_ratelimited("kvm: vcpu-%d: invalid arch lbr ctl.\n",
>> +			    vcpu->vcpu_id);
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>> +
>>    static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>>    {
>>    	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
>> @@ -384,6 +415,9 @@ static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>>    	case MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH:
>>    		msr_info->data = lbr_desc->records.nr;
>>    		return 0;
>> +	case MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL:
>> +		msr_info->data = vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL);
>> +		return 0;
>>    	default:
>>    		if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)) ||
>>    		    (pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0))) {
>> @@ -455,6 +489,16 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>>    		 */
>>    		wrmsrl(MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH, lbr_desc->records.nr);
>>    		return 0;
>> +	case MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL:
>> +		if (!arch_lbr_ctl_is_valid(vcpu, data))
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL, data);
>> +
>> +		if (intel_pmu_lbr_is_enabled(vcpu) && !lbr_desc->event &&
>> +		    (data & ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN))
>> +			intel_pmu_create_guest_lbr_event(vcpu);
>> +		return 0;
>>    	default:
>>    		if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)) ||
>>    		    (pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0))) {
>> @@ -668,12 +712,16 @@ static void intel_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>     */
>>    static void intel_pmu_legacy_freezing_lbrs_on_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>    {
>> -	u64 data = vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL);
>> +	u32 lbr_ctl_field = GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL;
>>    
>> -	if (data & DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI) {
>> -		data &= ~DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR;
>> -		vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, data);
>> -	}
>> +	if (!(vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL) & DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR) &&
>> +	    guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
>> +		lbr_ctl_field = GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL;
>> +
>> +	vmcs_write64(lbr_ctl_field, vmcs_read64(lbr_ctl_field) & ~0x1ULL);
>>    }
>>    
>>    static void intel_pmu_deliver_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> index 04d170c4b61e..73961fcfb62d 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> @@ -2022,6 +2022,13 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>>    						VM_EXIT_SAVE_DEBUG_CONTROLS)
>>    			get_vmcs12(vcpu)->guest_ia32_debugctl = data;
>>    
>> +		/*
>> +		 * For Arch LBR, IA32_DEBUGCTL[bit 0] has no meaning.
>> +		 * It can be written to 0 or 1, but reads will always return 0.
>> +		 */
>> +		if (guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
>> +			data &= ~DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR;
>> +
>>    		vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, data);
>>    		if (intel_pmu_lbr_is_enabled(vcpu) && !to_vmx(vcpu)->lbr_desc.event &&
>>    		    (data & DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR))
>> @@ -4548,6 +4555,11 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
>>    	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_APIC_PAGE_RELOAD, vcpu);
>>    
>>    	vpid_sync_context(vmx->vpid);
>> +
>> +	if (!init_event) {
>> +		if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
>> +			vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL, 0);
>> +	}
>>    }
>>    
>>    static void vmx_enable_irq_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ