linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] phy: qcom-edp: add regulator_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA8EJpqaGqHrdtX6NUHs2YOgeievpkbm8JbwQOU8+KoW4YNf2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 May 2022 19:02:58 +0300
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, agross@...nel.org,
        airlied@...ux.ie, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, daniel@...ll.ch,
        dianders@...omium.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        robdclark@...il.com, sean@...rly.run, vkoul@...nel.org,
        quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com, quic_aravindh@...cinc.com,
        quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] phy: qcom-edp: add regulator_set_load to edp phy

On Fri, 20 May 2022 at 18:09, Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/19/2022 5:19 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-05-19 16:11:40)
> >> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> >> index cacd32f..78b7306 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> >> @@ -87,14 +87,19 @@ struct qcom_edp {
> >>
> >>          struct clk_bulk_data clks[2];
> >>          struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2];
> >> +       int enable_load[2];
> >>   };
> >>
> >>   static int qcom_edp_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
> >>   {
> >>          struct qcom_edp *edp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> >>          int ret;
> >> +       int i;
> >>
> >> -       ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(edp->supplies), edp->supplies);
> >> +       for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> > Use ARRAY_SIZE(edp->supplies)?
> >
> >> +               regulator_set_load(edp->supplies[i].consumer, edp->enable_load[i]);
> >> +
> >> +       ret = regulator_bulk_enable(2, edp->supplies);
> > Why is ARRAY_SIZE() usage removed?
>
>
> remove it base on Dmitry's comment.

Ugh. I asked to remove the num_consumers variable, not the ARRAY_SIZE.

>
> I will restore it back to use ARRY_SIZE
>
>
> >
> >>          if (ret)
> >>                  return ret;
> >>



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry