[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee29eefa-9206-b84a-e27c-4e4388865db0@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:33:49 +0000
From: <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To: <palmer@...belt.com>, <palmer@...osinc.com>
CC: <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<lee.jones@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
<atulkhare@...osinc.com>, <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
<andrew@...n.ch>, <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
<aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] riscv: dts: sifive: "fix" pmic watchdog node name
On 06/06/2022 21:13, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> After converting the pmic watchdog binding to yaml, dtbs_check complains
> that the node name doesn't match the binding. "Fix" it.
Hey Palmer,
The three dt-binding changes were accepted - do I need to poke SiFive to
ack the dts change or are you fine just taking it?
Thanks,
Conor.
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
> index c4ed9efdff03..1f386b07a832 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ rtc {
> compatible = "dlg,da9063-rtc";
> };
>
> - wdt {
> + watchdog {
> compatible = "dlg,da9063-watchdog";
> };
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists