lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YrLwU27DNm0YWOvB@ZenIV>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:34:59 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     sunliming <sunliming@...inos.cn>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        sunliming@...ino.cn, kelulanainsley@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] walk_component(): get inode in lookup_slow branch
 statement block

On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 04:51:46PM +0800, sunliming wrote:
> The inode variable is used as a parameter by the step_into function,
> but is not assigned a value in the sub-lookup_slow branch path. So
> get the inode in the sub-lookup_slow branch path.

Take a good look at handle_mounts() and the things it does when
*not* in RCU mode (i.e. LOOKUP_RCU is not set).  Specifically,
                *inode = d_backing_inode(path->dentry);
		*seqp = 0; /* out of RCU mode, so the value doesn't matter */
this part.

IOW, the values passed to step_into() in inode/seq are overridden unless
we stay in RCU mode.  And if we'd been through lookup_slow(), we'd been
out of RCU mode since before we called step_into().

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ