[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4027cf04-d39e-d8fd-b3af-c1873757bb39@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:34:49 +0530
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
To: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>,
Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
Mohini Narkhede <mohini.narkhede@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched/fair: Introduce SIS_UTIL to search idle CPU
based on sum of util_avg
Hello Chenyu,
On 6/24/2022 7:37 AM, Chen Yu wrote:
>
> [..snip..]>
>> With v4 on the current tip, I don't see any need for
>> a special case for systems with smaller LLCs with
>> SIS_PROP disabled and SIS_UITL enable. Even SIS Efficiency
>> seems to be better with SIS_UTIL for hackbench.
>>
>> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
> Thanks again. Would you mind if I add this test report link into next patch
> version?
Sure.
I'm assuming the next version will disables SIS_PROP and only
keep SIS_UTIL enabled which is the same configuration we ran
during this round of testing. The results should stay the same :)
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists