linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf vendor events arm64: Arm Cortex-A78C and X1C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Jul 2022 17:17:08 +0100
From:   Nick Forrington <nick.forrington@....com>
To:     John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, acme@...nel.org
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Kilroy <andrew.kilroy@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf vendor events arm64: Arm Cortex-A78C and X1C

On 13/06/2022 11:09, John Garry wrote:
> On 10/06/2022 18:44, Nick Forrington wrote:
>> Add PMU events for the Arm Cortex-A78C and Arm Cortex-X1C CPUs.
>>
>> Events for Arm Cortex-A78C match those for Arm Cortex-A78.
>> Events for Arm Cortex-X1C match those for Arm Cortex- X1.
>>
>> As such, this is just a mapfile change.
>>
>> Main ID Register (MIDR) and event data is sourced from the corresponding
>> Arm Technical Reference Manuals:
>>
>> Arm Cortex-A78C
>> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/102226/
>>
>> Arm Cortex-X1C
>> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/101968/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nick Forrington<nick.forrington@....com>
>
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>

Could this be applied please?

Thanks,
Nick