linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] net: vlan: fix bridge binding behavior and add selftests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49f933c3-7430-a133-9add-ed76c395023b@blackwall.org>
Date:   Wed, 10 Aug 2022 17:50:34 +0300
From:   Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
To:     Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, aroulin@...dia.com, sbrivio@...hat.com,
        roopa@...dia.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] net: vlan: fix bridge binding behavior
 and add selftests

On 10/08/2022 17:42, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 4:54 AM Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org <mailto:razor@...ckwall.org>> wrote:
> 
>     On 10/08/2022 06:11, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote:
>     > When bridge binding is enabled for a vlan interface, it is expected
>     > that the link state of the vlan interface will track the subset of the
>     > ports that are also members of the corresponding vlan, rather than
>     > that of all ports.
>     >
>     > Currently, this feature works as expected when a vlan interface is
>     > created with bridge binding enabled:
>     >
>     >   ip link add link br name vlan10 type vlan id 10 protocol 802.1q \
>     >         bridge_binding on
>     >
>     > However, the feature does not work when a vlan interface is created
>     > with bridge binding disabled, and then enabled later:
>     >
>     >   ip link add link br name vlan10 type vlan id 10 protocol 802.1q \
>     >         bridge_binding off
>     >   ip link set vlan10 type vlan bridge_binding on
>     >
>     > After these two commands, the link state of the vlan interface
>     > continues to track that of all ports, which is inconsistent and
>     > confusing to users. This series fixes this bug and introduces two
>     > tests for the valid behavior.
>     >
>     > Sevinj Aghayeva (3):
>     >   net: core: export call_netdevice_notifiers_info
>     >   net: 8021q: fix bridge binding behavior for vlan interfaces
>     >   selftests: net: tests for bridge binding behavior
>     >
>     >  include/linux/netdevice.h                     |   2 +
>     >  net/8021q/vlan.h                              |   2 +-
>     >  net/8021q/vlan_dev.c                          |  25 ++-
>     >  net/core/dev.c                                |   7 +-
>     >  tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile          |   1 +
>     >  .../selftests/net/bridge_vlan_binding_test.sh | 143 ++++++++++++++++++
>     >  6 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>     >  create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/bridge_vlan_binding_test.sh
>     >
> 
>     Hi,
>     NETDEV_CHANGE event is already propagated when the vlan changes flags,
> 
> 
> I'm not sure if NETDEV_CHANGE is actually propagated when the vlan changes flags. The two functions in the bridge module that handle NETDEV_CHANGE are br_vlan_port_event  and br_vlan_bridge_event. I've installed probes for both, and when I'm changing flags using "sudo ip link set vlan10 type vlan bridge_binding on", I don't see any of those functions getting called, although I do see vlan_dev_change_flags getting called. I think there may be a bug in core/dev.c:__dev_notify_flags.

are both vlan and bridge interfaces up?
what exactly are you probing for?

I can see the NETDEV_CHANGE event go through when changing the loose binding.