[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220826183711.567bc7e8@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 18:37:11 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, michael@...le.cc,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: phy: micrel: Make the GPIO to be
non-exclusive
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 22:16:31 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:14:47PM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > The same GPIO line can be shared by multiple phys for the coma mode pin.
> > If that is the case then, all the other phys that share the same line
> > will failed to be probed because the access to the gpio line is not
> > non-exclusive.
> > Fix this by making access to the gpio line to be nonexclusive using flag
> > GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE. This allows all the other PHYs to be
> > probed.
> >
> > Fixes: 738871b09250ee ("net: phy: micrel: add coma mode GPIO")
> > Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
The tree name switch in the subject compared to v1 is unintentional?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists