[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99f0ee65-8239-5e7a-ce0f-f97e34624bda@amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:09:38 +0300
From: "Farber, Eliav" <farbere@...zon.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, <jdelvare@...e.com>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
<rtanwar@...linear.com>, <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <talel@...zon.com>, <hhhawa@...zon.com>, <jonnyc@...zon.com>,
<hanochu@...zon.com>, <ronenk@...zon.com>, <itamark@...zon.com>,
<shellykz@...zon.com>, <shorer@...zon.com>, <amitlavi@...zon.com>,
<almogbs@...zon.com>, <dkl@...zon.com>,
<andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>, "Farber, Eliav" <farbere@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/19] hwmon: (mr75203) fix VM sensor allocation when "intel,
vm-map" not defined
On 8/31/2022 8:49 AM, Farber, Eliav wrote:
> On 8/31/2022 8:36 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 8/30/22 12:21, Eliav Farber wrote:
>>> Bug fix - in case "intel,vm-map" is missing in device-tree ,'num' is
>>> set
>>> to 0, and no voltage channel infos are allocated.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eliav Farber <farbere@...zon.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c | 28 ++++++++++++----------------
>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c b/drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c
>>> index 046523d47c29..0e29877a1a9c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/mr75203.c
>>> @@ -580,8 +580,6 @@ static int mr75203_probe(struct platform_device
>>> *pdev)
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (vm_num) {
>>> - u32 num = vm_num;
>>> -
>>> ret = pvt_get_regmap(pdev, "vm", pvt);
>>> if (ret)
>>> return ret;
>>> @@ -594,30 +592,28 @@ static int mr75203_probe(struct
>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>> ret = device_property_read_u8_array(dev, "intel,vm-map",
>>> pvt->vm_idx, vm_num);
>>> if (ret) {
>>> - num = 0;
>>> + /*
>>> + * Incase intel,vm-map property is not
>>> defined, we
>>> + * assume incremental channel numbers.
>>> + */
>>> + for (i = 0; i < vm_num; i++)
>>> + pvt->vm_idx[i] = i;
>>> } else {
>>> for (i = 0; i < vm_num; i++)
>>> if (pvt->vm_idx[i] >= vm_num ||
>>> - pvt->vm_idx[i] == 0xff) {
>>> - num = i;
>>> + pvt->vm_idx[i] == 0xff)
>>> break;
>>
>> So all vm_idx values from 0x00 to 0xfe would be acceptable ?
>> Does the chip really have that many registers (0x200 + 0x40 + 0x200 *
>> 0xfe) ?
>> Is that documented somewhere ?
> According to the code vm_num is limited to 32 because the mask is
> only 5 bits:
>
For 5 bit mask, maximum is of course 31 and not 32.
> #define VM_NUM_MSK GENMASK(20, 16)
> #define VM_NUM_SFT 16
> vm_num = (val & VM_NUM_MSK) >> VM_NUM_SFT;
>
> In practice according to the data sheet I have:
> 0 <= VM instances <= 8
>
> --
> Regards, Eliav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists