[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <393933f5-9a87-4d12-2527-5adfa4aeccca@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2022 10:28:01 +0300
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: lan9662-otpc: document Lan9662 OTPC
On 31/08/2022 09:42, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> Document Lan9662 OTP controller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  .../nvmem/microchip,lan9662-otpc.yaml         | 45 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,lan9662-otpc.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,lan9662-otpc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,lan9662-otpc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..def20733cf60
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,lan9662-otpc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/microchip,lan9662-otpc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Microchip LAN9662 OTP Controller (OTPC)
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
> +
> +description: |
> +  OTP controller drives a NVMEM memory where system specific data
> +  (e.g. hardware configuration settings, chip identifiers) or
> +  user specific data could be stored.
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: nvmem.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - const: microchip,lan9662-otpc
> +          - const: microchip,lan9668-otpc
> +      - enum:
> +          - microchip,lan9662-otpc
This is not what I wrote and this does not make sense. You now listed
twice 9662 and 9668 does not have its entry.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
