[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48590f80-fc58-bf67-5acf-082880a607b2@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:32:45 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chris@...kel.net, jcmvbkbc@...il.com, maobibo@...ngson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix misuse of update_mmu_cache() in
do_anonymous_page()
On 25.09.22 03:43, Muchun Song wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 24, 2022, at 13:32, Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com> wrote:
>>
>> As message in commit 7df676974359 ("mm/memory.c: Update local TLB
>> if PTE entry exists") said, we should update local TLB only on the
>> second thread. So fix the misuse of update_mmu_cache() by using
>> update_mmu_tlb() in the do_anonymous_page().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
>
> The change looks good to me. However, I am not sure what is the user-visible
> effect to xtensa users. So Cc xtensa’s maintainer and the author of 7df676974359
> to double check this.
And if there is one, do we have a fixes tag?
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists