lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <868rlv8jc4.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 04 Oct 2022 20:44:27 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     "Colin King (gmail)" <colin.i.king@...il.com>,
        Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: irqchip: Add IMX MU MSI controller driver

On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 20:37:46 +0100,
"Colin King (gmail)" <colin.i.king@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Static analysis with clang scan-build detected an issue with the
> following commit in linux-next:
> 
> commit 70afdab904d2d1e68bffe75fe08e7e48e0b0ff8e
> Author: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> Date:   Thu Sep 22 11:12:43 2022 -0500
> 
>     irqchip: Add IMX MU MSI controller driver
> 
> The issue is as follows in source drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c :
> 
> 
> static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx8ulp = {
>         .type   = IMX_MU_V2,
>         .xTR    = 0x200,
>         .xRR    = 0x280,
>         .xSR    = {
>                         [IMX_MU_SR]  = 0xC,
>                         [IMX_MU_GSR] = 0x118,
>                         [IMX_MU_GSR] = 0x124,    /* <--- issue here */
>                         [IMX_MU_RSR] = 0x12C,
>                   },
>         .xCR    = {
>                         [IMX_MU_GIER] = 0x110,
>                         [IMX_MU_GCR]  = 0x114,
>                         [IMX_MU_TCR]  = 0x120,
>                         [IMX_MU_RCR]  = 0x128
>                   },
> };
> 
> The .xSR object with index  IMX_MU_GSR is being set twice, once with
> 0x118 and again with 0x128. I believe the first one should be
> IMX_MU_TSR but w/o the datasheet I don't want to make any assumptions.

Huh, nice catch.

Frank, can you please provide a fix for this ASAP?

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ